As the father of ecosophy and a real pioneer of holistic ecological thinking, Naess has created the basis on which much green thinking rests.
by Jan Bojer Vindheim, Milj¯partiet de Gr¯nne, Norway
The philosopher Arne Naess, who died recently at the age of 96, left a rich body of work behind. Internationally he was known as the originator of deep ecology, but environmentalism was just one facet of his philosophical work. In addition to his fame as a thinker, he was also well known as a mountaineer and even as a competent boxer. Naess was influential in founding the Green Party in Norway, and in shaping Green Party philosophy around the world.
Born in Oslo on January 27, 1912, Arne Dekke Eide Naess studied in Paris, Vienna, Berkeley and Oslo. He received his doctorate in Philosophy at the age of 24 and became Norwayís youngest ever professor three years later, in 1939. At this time he identified himself as a logical positivist, that is a follower of strict materialist scientism, a position he later modified significantly.
Arne Naess was an active sportsman. As a mountaineer he traveled all over the world to climb its mountains and reach new spiritual and physical heights in the process. His love of and respect for mountains and mountain scenery permeated his work until the end of his life.†
As professor he introduced a compulsory course in philosophy for new students, and wrote several textbooks that are still in use in Norwegian universities, including a manual of logic.
During the German occupation of Norway (1940-45), Naess was involved with resistance groups. After the war however, he became a spokesman for tolerance and forgiveness towards the many collaborators in the general population. At this time he also encountered the thinking of Mohandas Gandhi, becoming impressed by the Indian’s clarity of thinking. †In particular he found the concept of the unity of all living beings, and of self-realization as an approach to truth in a philosophical sense, to be compelling, and these concepts colored his thinking thereafter.†
Together with peace researcher Johan Galtung, Naess systematized Gandhi’s teachings on nonviolence, and visited India several times to discuss Gandhian philosophy there. His writings on Gandhi, such as his book Gandhi and the Nuclear Age (1965) are astute, deeply engaged, and spiritually beautiful responses to Gandhi’s teachings and stand out among all the books written about Gandhi.
Naess was also strongly influenced by the 17th-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza, who maintained a spiritual vision of the unity and sacredness of nature and believed that the highest level of knowledge was an intuitive and mystical kind of knowing where subject/object distinctions disappeared as the mind united with the whole of nature.†
In the 1960s Naess took up the study of environmentalism, which eventually would become the most famous part of his work. He was not content however with merely thinking about environmentalism, but was also an activist, inspired by Rachel Carsonís 1962 book Silent Spring. Naess participated in Norway’s first major environmental protest in 1970, taking non-violent direct action by chaining himself to rocks in front of construction machinery to stop the building of a dam above the Mard¯la waterfall. The use of nonviolence in this occasion set a precedent which is still followed by all major environmental groups in Norway.†
In the 1960s while teaching at the University of California Berkeley as a visiting professor, Naess was introduced to the psychedelic drug LSD, which he claimed had a significant influence on his later thinking. During this period he left the certainties of positivism and entered philosophical regions where many truths exist side by side. His own systematic formulation of ecological philosophy was significantly called Ecosophy T, to indicate the possibility of other equally valid ecosophies, and with the T standing for the Tvergastein mountain hut where he lived and worked.
In 1973, Naess published a short article in the journal Inquiry (which he had founded) entitled ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement’, influencing the ecology movement worldwide. In this widely reprinted article, Naess argued that a deep ecological movement must identify with life itself, protecting other species not for their value to humans, but for their intrinsic value as aspects of the wholeness of life.
He contrasted Deep Ecology with what he termed a shallow ecology movement that believed protecting the environment could be accomplished within the existing structure of society, without reforming basic human relations with nature; but by better technologies, economic growth, and scientific management.
The influence of Naessís views was widespread, but they were also challenged from within the environmental movement. Murray Bookchin, architect of the anarchistic green social philosophy known as Social Ecology, attacked deep ecology as “eco-la-la”, maintaining that it failed to account for socio-economic factors in environmental problems, as well as the inherent anti-ecological nature of global capitalism.†
The Deep Ecology movement spanned many advocates during this period, including Judi Bari, Thomas Berry, Wendell Berry, Fritjof Capra, Bill Devall, David Foreman, Warwick Fox, Joanna Macy, David Orton, John Seed, George Sessions, Gary Snyder and others. The debate between Deep Ecology and Social Ecology provided a distinct philosophical context for strategic debate, as the Green movement grew throughout the 1980s and early 1990s.
In 1980 as part of his opposition to a planned dam on the Alta-Kautokeino river, Naess coined the slogan “let the river live” during the most heated environmental campaign in Norwegian history, indicating that respect for non-human life-forms should also be extended to landscapes and other features of the natural world.†
During the 1970s and í80s Naess took part in several nonviolent protests, while at the same time becoming a major force in driving Norwegian mainstream politics towards awareness of ecological problems. One result of this was that several political parties adopted fairly radical environmental programs. Another was the birth of the Green Party in Norway ñ the Milj¯partiet de Gr¯nne.†
Environmental lists were organized in many places through the seventies and eighties, some places taking names like “Green Party” or “Green List.” In 1987 a group of academics presented several lists under the name “The Greens” at local elections, and gained a seat in the district council of Akershus, near Oslo. Encouraged by this moderate success they contacted other local environmental voter alliances, and began a series of discussions in the offices of the Center for Environment and Development, a university department led by Naess, eventually leading in the fall of 1988 to the founding of the nationwide Milj¯partiet de Gr¯nne (meaning “The Environmental Party The Greensî).
Naess himself did not seek public office but regularly anchored the partyís campaigns since 1987 by holding the last place on the Green local and national election lists in Oslo. Over the years Naess attended occasional party meetings, appeared at one or two rallies each election campaign, and occasionally contributed to the party magazine. Even though the Norwegian Greens have not yet gained parliamentary representation, Naess continued to believe their electoral presence served an important role. Naess also briefly served as the Chair of Greenpeace Norway when it was founded in 1998.
In his later years Naess became an increasingly well-known public figure in Norway, and as a respected philosopher on the international scene. †He featured regularly on TV talk shows and wrote or coauthored several popular books on the application of philosophy. Naess also consistently called for a substantial reduction in human population, arguing that a world population of 100 million – roughly a 60th of the present figure – would be compatible with quality of life across the planet.
Naess was a whole human being noted for his sense of humor and a level of physical activity that amazed many who were many decades younger.
Transcending his youthful agnosticism, Naess claimed to be a religious atheist at the end of his life. He was given a state Funeral at Riis Church in Oslo, but with no Christian hymns. The prime Minister and members of the royal family were present, as well as his wife Kitt-Fai and his children and grandchildren.†
Upon his passing, the Milj¯partiet issued a statement saying, ìNÊss has been a source of inspiration not only to us, but to the entire international movement of green parties. As the father of ecosophy and a real pioneer of holistic ecological thinking, he has created the basis on which much green thinking rests. In many ways he was far ahead of his time. His humility, sense of wonder, and playful attitude towards all that surrounds us are values we now need more than ever.î
Arne Naess was not afraid of dying, and indeed through his work, he and his work will continue to live. †
Jan Bojer Vindheim is a co-founder of the Norwegian Green Party Milj¯partiet de Gr¯nne, has served as one of its national spokespersons on several occasions and is currently an elected Green on the city council of Trondheim, Norway.†
Along wiht Edward Abbey, Mr. Naess shaped me into the activist I have been since the 70s. The world will miss him…the Earth a whole lot more!
Arne Naess was a truly remarkable man, and one that influenced me to subscribe to this growing and vital movement.
I have written somethingalong the lines usin the 8 principles of deep ecology. Yopu can read them at
Robert L. Fielding
Thank you for the in-memoriam article of a remarkable man.
He has influenced my thinking enormously, to become a deep ecologist myself.
He will always be my admirable Teacher.